- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources4
- Resource Type
-
0003000001000000
- More
- Availability
-
40
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Ghosh, Pallabi (4)
-
Forte, Domenic (3)
-
Chakraborty, Rajat Subhra (2)
-
Ganji, Fatemeh (2)
-
Woodard, Damon (2)
-
Botero, Ulbert (1)
-
Botero, Ulbert J (1)
-
Botero, Ulbert J. (1)
-
Dizon-Paradis, Olivia P. (1)
-
Jacobs, David (1)
-
Lee, Gijung (1)
-
PNVR, Koutilya (1)
-
Siddiquie, Behjat (1)
-
Singh, Bharat (1)
-
Woodard, Damon L. (1)
-
Zhu, Mengdi (1)
-
#Tyler Phillips, Kenneth E. (0)
-
#Willis, Ciara (0)
-
& Abreu-Ramos, E. D. (0)
-
& Abramson, C. I. (0)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
null (1)
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Brennan K. (0)
-
& Brennan, K. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Ferretti, F. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& J. Peters (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Sahin. I. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
PNVR, Koutilya; Singh, Bharat; Ghosh, Pallabi; Siddiquie, Behjat; Jacobs, David (, IEEE)
-
Ghosh, Pallabi; Botero, Ulbert J; Ganji, Fatemeh; Woodard, Damon; Chakraborty, Rajat Subhra; Forte, Domenic (, IEEE Physical Assurance and Inspection of Electronics (PAINE))null (Ed.)
-
Ghosh, Pallabi; Botero, Ulbert; Ganji, Fatemeh; Woodard, Damon; Chakraborty, Rajat Subhra; Forte, Domenic (, IEEE International Conference on Physical Assurance and Inspection of Electronics (PAINE))Today’s globalized supply chain for electronics design, fabrication, and distribution has resulted in a proliferation of counterfeit chips. Recycled and remarked chips are the most common counterfeit types in the market, and prior work has shown that physical inspection is the best approach to detect them. However, it can be time-consuming, expensive, and destructive while relying on the use of subject matter experts. This paper proposes a low-cost, automated detection technique that examines surface variations within and between chips to identify defective chips. Further, it can estimate the location of the defects for additional analysis. The proposed method only requires a cheap IR camera-based setup to capture images of the chip package surface and is completely unsupervised and non-destructive. Experimental results on 25 chips in our lab demonstrate 100% detection accuracy.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

Full Text Available